Pete Cashmore (@mashable)
2/4/12 10:35 AM
Expand your Twitter capabilities with these 5 apps –on.mash.to/xfJ04Y



june 8, 2009

Twitter has caught fire across many professional fields as well as personally, but it seems to be in the beginning stages in the realm of higher education. The creative ways Twitter users have incorporated microblogging has become inspirational, so the recent trend of using Twitter at college is sure to keep evolving into an ever more impressive tool. Make sure you don’t get left behind by incorporating some of these educational and fun ways that Twitter can be used in the college classroom.


Twitter offers new and exciting ways to open up the lines of communication in the classroom. Find out some of the ways it can work with this list.

  1. Direct Tweet. Professors and students can contact each other through direct Tweets without having to share cell phone numbers.
  2. Get to know your classmates. A class Twitter group will help facilitate professors and students getting to know each other, especially if the class is part of a more intimate setting such as a seminar.
  3. Collaborate on projects. When working together on projects, set up a group using an app like Tweetworks to facilitate communication between everyone working together.
  4. Make announcements. Professors can send out reminders about upcoming tests, project due dates, or any news that needs to be shared via Twitter.
  5. Brainstorm. The ability to share ideas as the occur any time and any where creates an excellent opportunity for brainstorming on class topics.
  6. Take a poll. Ask student their opinions or get feedback on future projects or topics by using an app like PollDaddy.
  7. Share interesting websites. Both professors and students can post interesting websites that are relevant to their class.
  8. Daily learning. Twitter feeds happen much more frequently than the two or three times a day a student is in class, therefore using Twitter in the classroom means there is a daily opportunity for learning.
  9. Ambient awareness. This blog post on TwiTip offers an excellent description of ambient awareness and how it facilitates getting to know those you follow in more meaningful ways.

Twitter for Professional Development

One of best and worst things about teaching today is the unbelievably unfathomable amount of online resources, tools, websites, lesson plans, and overall good stuff for teaching and learning.  However, there are only so many hours and minutes in the day to spend researching and finding resources that are relevant to your life as a teacher.  How do you keep up with it all?   Simply put: Twitter.There  is nothing better than having a good group of “goto” people that you can turn to with questions about resources, bounce ideas off of for lessons and projects, and collaborate with on a regular basis.  Hopefully you have a team of people in your school or district who you work with that serve this purpose, but wouldn’t it be great if you could also find a more global group of like-minded teachers to broaden your horizons a bit?Twitter to the rescue!   This is the absolutely first place I go for answers, professional development, feedback on an idea, etc.  However, this just doesn’t happen overnight.  It takes a bit of work to build up a nice group of Twitter followers, but its not hard work.  Firstly, make sure you have completed your Twitter biography with information that explains who you are and what you are interested in learning from others.  Then,  simply start with ONE educator that you would like to follow on Twitter.  Then, click on that person’s list of followers and follow a few.  Then, click on their followers, so forth and so on.  Before you know it, you will be following hundreds of people and they most likely will follow you back and you will have built your online group of “goto” educators!

In addition to just following educators and others with the same interests as you, there are several different hashtags that you can follow that revolve around the educational realm.  Hashtags such as #edchat and #teaching can be seen all over Twitter these days.  Clicking on a hashtag brings up a search of all such tags and can be an awesome way to follow or jump into a twitter conversation about certain topic.

Check out the links below for some help in getting start with Twitter as an educator.  Sooner than later you will be asking and answering questions with the best of them!

ABEL (@ABELearn)
06/09/2011 15:05
Teaching with Twitter –http://t.co/2CYIa4X

Teaching With Twitter: Not for the Faint of Heart

Students are emboldened, but they can also hijack discussions

By Jeffrey R. Young

West Lafayette, Ind.

Maybe Sugato Chakravarty should wear a helmet to class. The professor of consumer sciences and retailing at Purdue University repeatedly attempts the instructional equivalent of jumping a motorcycle over a row of flaming barrels.

OK, asking 250 students to post questions on Twitter during a class doesn’t risk life or limb. But it can cause ego damage if the mob of students in his course on personal finance gets disorderly online

More at: http://t.co/2CYIa4X

Architectural Record (@ArchRecord)
10/07/2011 16:12
How Do Architects Use Twitter? [INFOGRAPHIC] http://ht.ly/5ANuI via @alltwtr

  1.  Antenos-Conforti, Enza. (2009). Microblogging on Twitter: Social Networking in Intermediate Italian Classes.In Lara Lomicka and Gillian Lord (Eds.), The Next Generation: Social Networking and Online Collaboration in Foreign Language Learning. (pp. 59-90). Calico Monograph Series, No. 9. (book chapter)
  2.  Arceneaux, Noah, and Amy Schmitz Weiss. (2010). Seems Stupid Until You Try It: Press Coverage of Twitter, 2006-9. New Media and Society, . (journal article)
  3.  Böhringer, Martin. (2009). Really Social Syndication: A Conceptual View on Microblogginging. 9(31) (techreport)
  4.  Böhringer, Martin, and Richter, Alexander. (2009). Adopting Social Software to the Intranet: A Case Study on Enterprise Microblogging. Proceedings of the 9th Mensch & Computer Conference. (pp. 293-302).Berlin September 6-9. (conference paper)
  5.  Bakshy, Eytan, Hofman, Jake M., Mason, Winter A., and Watts, Duncan J.. (2011). Everyone’s an Influencer: Quantifying Influence on Twitter. Proceedings of WSDM\’11. Hong Kong, China (conference paper)
  6.  Barnes, Stuart J., Böhringer, Martin, Kurze, Christian, and Stietzel, Jacqueline. (2010). Towards an understanding of social software: the case of Arinia. Proceedings of HICSS-43.Kauai, HI January 5-8. (conference paper)
  7.  Barnes, Stuart J., and Böhringer, Martin. (2009). Continuance Usage Intention in Microblogging Services: The Case of Twitter (Konferenzbeitrag). Proceedings of the 17th European Conference on Information Systems (ECIS).Verona, Italy June 8-10. (conference paper)
  8.  boyd, danah, Golder, Scott, and Lotan, Gilad. (2010). Tweet Tweet Retweet: Conversational Aspects of Retweeting on Twitter. Proceedings of HICSS-43.Kauai, HI January 5-8. (conference paper)
  9.  Cain, Jeff, Scott, Doneka R., and Smith, Kelly. (2010). Use of social media by residency program directors for resident selection. American Journal of Health-System Pharmacy, 67 (19), 1635-1639. (journal article)
  10.  Cha, Meeyoung, Haddadi, Hamed, Benevenuto, Fabricio, and Gummadi, Krishna P.. (2010). Measuring User Influence in Twitter: The Million Follower Fallacy. Proceedings of ICWSM. AAAI. (conference paper)
  11.  Chen, Jilin, Nairn, Rowan, Nelson, Les, Bernstein, Michael, and Chi, Ed H.. (2010). Short and Tweet: Experiments on Recommending Content from Information Streams. Proceedings of CHI. (conference paper)
  12.  Cheong, Mark, and Lee, Vincent. (2009). Integrating web-based intelligence retrieval and decision-making from the twitter trends knowledge base. Proceeding of the 2nd ACM workshop on Social web search and mining. (pp. 1-8). (conference paper)
  13.  Chew C, and Eysenbach G. (2010). Pandemics in the Age of Twitter: Content Analysis of Tweets during the 2009 H1N1 Outbreak. Plos One, 5 (11), e14118. Between May 1 and December 31, 2009, authors archived over 2 million Twitter posts containing keywords “swine flu,” “swineflu,” and/or “H1N1.” using Infovigil, an infoveillance system. This study illustrates the potential of using social media (journal article)
  14.  Crawford, Kate. (2009). These Foolish Things: On Intimacy and Insignificance in Mobile Media.In Goggin, Gerard and Hjorth, Larissa (Eds.), Mobile Technologies: From Telecommunications to Media. (book chapter)
  15.  Crawford, Kate. (2009). Following you: Disciplines of listening in social media. Journal of Media & Culture Studies, 23 (4), 525-535. (journal article)
  16.  Cuneyt Gurcan Akcora, Murat Ali Bayir, Murat Demirbas, and Hakan Ferhatosmanoglu. (2010). Identifying Breakpoints in Public Opinion. Proceedings of SOMA\’10 SIGKDD. (pp. 5). (conference paper)
  17.  Devin Gaffney. (2010). #iranElection: quantifying online activism. Proceedings of the WebSci10.Raleigh, NC April 26-27th.
  18.  Diakopoulos, N. A., and Shamma, D. A.. (2010). Characterizing Debate Performance via Aggregated Twitter Sentiment. CHI 2010.Atlanta, Georgia
  19.  Du, Hongly, Rosson, Mary Beth, Carroll, John M., and Ganoe, Craig. (2009). I felt like a contributing member of the class: increasing class participation with classcommons. Proceedings of the ACM 2009 international conference on Supporting group work. (pp. 232-242). (conference paper)
  20.  Dunlap, J.C., and Lowenthal, P. R.. (2009). Horton Hears a Tweet. EDUCAUSE Quarterly, 32(4). (journal article)
  21.  Dunlap, J.C., and Lowenthal, P.R.. (). Tweeting the Night Away: Using Twitter to Enhance Social Presence. Journal of Information Systems Education, 20 (2). (journal article)
  22.  Ebner, Martin, and Schiefner, Mandy. (2008). Microblogging – more than fun?.In ArnedilloSánchez, Inmaculada and Isaías, Pedro (Eds.), Proceedings of IADIS Mobile Learning Conference 2008. (pp. 155 – 159).Algarve, Portugal (conference paper)
  23.  Ehrlich, K., and Shami, N.S.. (2010). Microblogging inside and outside the workplace. In Proceedings of the 4th International AAAI Conference on Weblogs and Social Media. (ICWSM 2010), AAAI Publications. (conference paper)
  24.  Gayo-Avello, Daniel. (2010). Nepotistic Relationships in Twitter and their Impact on Rank Prestige Algorithms. (Preprint). (journal article)
  25.  Gilpin, Dawn R.. (Forthcoming). Working the Twittersphere: How Public Relations Practitioners Use Microblogging for Professional Identity Construction.In Papacharissi, Zizi (Eds.), The Networked Self. (book chapter)
  26.  Gina Masullo Chen. (2011). Tweet this: A uses and gratifications perspective on how active Twitter use gratifies a need to connect with others. Computers in Human Behavior, 27(2), 755-762. (journal article)
  27.  Gomez-Rodriguez, Manuel, Leskovec, Jure, and Krause, Andreas. (2010). Inferring Networks of Diffusion and Influence. Proceedings of KDD. ACM. Washington, DC (conference paper)
  28.  Haewoon Kwak, Changhyun Lee, Hosung Park, and Sue Moon. (2010). What is Twitter, a Social Network or a News Media?. Proceedings of the 19th International World Wide Web (WWW) Conference. April 26-30, 2010, Raleigh NC (USA) (conference paper)
  29.  Haewoon, Kwak, Changhyun, Lee, Park, Hosung, and Moon, Sue. (2010). What is Twitter, a Social Network or a News Media?. 19th International World Wide Web (WWW) Conference.Raleigh, North Carolina April.
  30.  Hermida, Alfred. (2010). Twittering the News: The Emergence of Ambient Journalism. Journalism Practice, 4 (3), 297 – 308. (journal article)
  31.  Hermida, Alfred. (2010). From TV to Twitter: How Ambient News Became Ambient Journalism. M/C Journal, 13 (2), NA. (journal article)
  32.  Herwig, Jana. (2009). Liminality and Communitas in Social Media: The Case of Twitter. Internet: Critical. Internet Research 10.0.Milwaukee October 7-10. (conference paper)
  33.  Heverin, Thomas, and Zach, Lisl. (2010). Microblogging for Crisis Communication: Examination of Twitter Use in Response to a 2009 Violent Crisis in Seattle-Tacoma, Washington Area. Proceedings of the 2010 ISCRAM Conference.Seattle, Washington
  34.  Heverin, Thomas, and Zach, Lisl. (2010). Twitter for City Police Department Information Sharing. ASIS&T.Pittsburgh, PA, USA October.
  35.  Honeycutt, C., and Herring, Susan C.. (2009). Beyond microblogging: Conversation and collaboration via Twitter. Proceedings of the Forty-Second Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.Los Alamitos, CA IEEE Press. (conference paper)
  36.  Huberman, Bernardo A., Romero, Daniel M., and Wu, Fang. (2008). Social Networks that Matter: Twitter Under the Microscope. (techreport)
  37.  Huberman, Bernardo, Romero, Daniel, and Wu, Fang. (2009). Social networks that matter: Twitter under the microscope. First Monday, 14 (1). (journal article)
  38.  Hughes, Amanda lee, and Palen, Leysia. (2009). Twitter Adoption and Use in Mass Convergence and Emergency Events. Proceedings of the 2009 ISCRAM Conference. (conference paper)
  39.  Ifukor. (2011). #EkitiElection: The Acts and Facts of Twittering the Final Judicial Proceedings in Nigeria (on October 15, 2010). General Online Research 2011.Heinrich-Heine University, Duesseldorf, Germany March 14-16.
  40.  Ifukor, Presley. (2010). \”Elections\” or \”Selections\”? Blogging and Twittering the Nigerian 2007 General Elections.. Bulletin of Science, Technology & Society, 30 (6), 398-414. Twitter and the Nigerian blogosphere (journal article)
  41.  Jaime Teevan, Daniel Ramage, and Meredith Ringel Morris. (2011). #TwitterSearch: A Comparison of Microblog Search and Web Search. WSDM 2011.
  42.  Jansen, Bernard, Zhang, Mimi, Sobel, Kate, and Chowdury, Abdur. (2009). Twitter Power: Tweets as Electronic Word of Mouth. Journal of ASIS&T, 60(9), 1-20. (journal article)
  43.  Java, Akshay, Song, Xiaodan, Finin, Tim, and Tseng, Belle. (2007). Why We Twitter: Understanding the Microblogging Effect in User Intentions and Communities. WebKDD.San Jose, CA August 12-15. (conference paper)
  44.  Johnson, Philip R., and Yang, Sung-Un. (2009). Uses and Gratifications of Twitter: An Examination of User Motives and Satisfaction of Twitter Use. (techreport)
  45.  Junco, Reynol, Heiberger, Greg, and Loken, Eric. (2010). The effect of Twitter on college student engagement and grades. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2729.2010.00387.x, 14. (journal article)
  46.  Justin W. Owens, Kelsi Lenz, and Stephanie Speagle. (2009). Trick or Tweet: How Usable is Twitter for First-Time Users?. The source of this article is Usability News, a Wichita State University newsletter produced by their Software Usability Research Laboratory (SURL). While the study is smale in scale, the research methodology appears sound. (misc)
  47.  Keim, Nina, and Clark, Jessica. (2009). Public Media 2.0 Field Report: Building Social Media Infrastructure to Engage Publics. (techreport)
  48.  Kim, Dongwoo, Jo, Yohan, Moon, Il-Chul, and Oh, Alice. (2010). Analysis of Twitter Lists as a Potential Source for Discovering Latent Characteristics of Users. Workshop on Microblogging at the ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computer Systems. (CHI 2010). (conference paper)
  49.  Kossinets, Gueorgi, Kleinberg, Jon, and Watts, Duncan J.. (2008). The structure of information pathways in a social communication network. Proceeding of SIGKDD. ACM. New York, NY (conference paper)
  50.  Krishnamurthy, Balachander, Gill, Phillipa, and Arlitt, Martin. (2008). A few chirps about Twitter. Proceedings of the first workshop on Online social networks. (pp. 19-24). (conference paper)
  51.  Kwak, Haewoon, Lee, Changhyun, Park, Hosung, and Moon, Sue. (2010). What is Twitter, a Social Network or a News Media?. The 19th World-Wide Web (WWW) Conference.Raleigh, North Carolina (conference paper)
  52.  Lenhart, Amanda, and Fox, Susannah. (2009). Twitter and status updating. (techreport)
  53.  Lerman, K., and Ghosh, R.. (2010). Information contagion: an empirical study of the spread of news on digg and twitter social networks. In Proceedings of 4th International Conference on Weblogs and Social Media (ICWSM). (conference paper)
  54.  Letierce, Julie, Passant, Alexandre, Breslin, John, and Decker, Stefan. (2010). Understanding how Twitter is used to widely spread Scientific Messages. In Proceedings of the WebSci10: Extending the Frontiers of Society On-Line. (conference paper)
  55.  Makice, Kevin. (2009). Phatics and the design of community. Proceedings of the 27th international conference extended abstracts on Human factors in computing systems. (pp. 3133-3136). (conference paper)
  56.  Marwick, Alice, and boyd, danah. (Forthcoming). To See and Be Seen: Celebrity Practice on Twitter. Convergence. (journal article)
  57.  Marwick, Alice, and boyd, danah. (Forthcoming). I Tweet Honestly, I Tweet Passionately: Twitter Users, Context Collapse, and the Imagined Audience. New Media and Society. (journal article)
  58.  McNely, B.. (2009). Backchannel persistence and collaborative meaning-making. Proceedings of the 27th ACM International Conference on Design of Communication. (pp. 297-303).Bloomington, IN Oct. 5-7. ACM. (conference paper)
  59.  McNely, B.. (2010). Exploring a sustainable and public information ecology. SIGDOC ‘10: Proceedings of the 28th ACM International Conference on Design of Communication. (pp. 103–108). ACM. (conference paper)
  60.  Michael D. Conover, Jacob Ratkiewicz, Bruno Goncalves, Matt Francisco, Alessandro Flammini, and Filippo Menczer. (2011). Political Polarization on Twitter. Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Weblogs and Social Media (ICWSM 2011). (pp. 8). (conference paper)
  61.  Miller, Vincent. (2008). New Media, Networking, and Phatic Culture. Convergence, 14(4), 387 – 400. (journal article)
  62.  Mishaud, Edward. (2007). Twitter: Expressions of the Whole Self. Department of Media and Communications (mastersthesis)
  63.  Morris, Meredith Ringel, Teevan, Jaime, and Panovich, Katrina. (2010). What Do People Ask Their Social Networks, and Why? A Survey Study of Status Message & Behavior. In Proceedings of CHI 2010. (conference paper)
  64.  Muntean, Nick, and Peterson, Anne Helen. (2009). Celebrity Twitter: Strategies of Intrusion and Disclosure in the Age of Technoculture. M/C Journal, 12 (5). (journal article)
  65.  Murat Demirbas, Murat Ali Bayir, Cuneyt Gurcan Akcora, Yavuz Selim Yilmaz, and Hakan Ferhatosmanoglu. (2010). Crowd-Sourced Sensing and Collaboration Using Twitter. WOWMOM.Montreal, Canada June.
  66.  Murphy, Joe. (2008). Better Practices From the Field: Micro-Blogging for Science & Technology Libraries. 28(4) (techreport)
  67.  Naaman, Mor, Becker, Hila, and Gravano, Luis. (2011). Hip and Trendy: Characterizing Emerging Trends on Twitter. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 62 (n/a). (journal article)
  68.  Naaman, Mor, Boase, Jeffery, and Lai, Chih-Hui. (2010). Is it Really About Me? Message Content in Social Awareness Streams. Proceedings of CSCW-2010.Savannah Georgia February 6-10. (conference paper)
  69.  Nagarajan, Meenakshi, Gomadam, Karthik, Sheth, Amit, Mutharaju, Raghava, and Jadhav, Ashutosh. (2009). Spatio-Temporal-Thematic Analysis of Citizen-Sensor Data – Challenges and Experiences. Tenth International Conference on Web Information Systems Engineering. (conference paper)
  70.  O’Connor, Brendan, Balasubramanyan, Ramnath, Routledge, Bryan R., and Smith, Noah. (2010). From Tweets to Polls: Linking Text Sentiment to Public Opinion Time Series. In Proceedings of ICWSM. (conference paper)
  71.  Oulasvirta, Antti, Lehtonen, Esko, Kurvinen, Esko, and Raento, Mika. (2009). Making the ordinary visible in microblogs. Personal and Ubiquitous Computing. Online first. Special issue on Social Interaction and Mundane Technologies (journal article)
  72.  Passant, Alexandre, Hastrup, Tuukka, Bojars, Uldis, and Breslin, John. (2009). Microblogging: A Semantic Web and Distributed Approach. Proceedings of the the 4th Workshop Scripting For the Semantic Web (SFSW2008) co-located with ESWC2008. (conference paper)
  73.  Romero, Daniel, Meeder, Brendan, and Kleinberg, Jon. (2011). Differences in the Mechanics of Information Diffusion Across Topics: Idioms, Political Hashtags, and Complex Contagion on Twitter. World Wide Web Conference (WWW). (conference paper)
  74.  Sarma, Anish Das, Sarma, Atish Das, Panigrahy, Rina, and Gollapudi, Sreenivas. (2009). Ranking Mechanisms in Twitter-like Forums. (techreport)
  75.  Shamma, D.A., Kennedy, L., and Churchill, E.F.. (2010). Tweetgeist: Can the Twitter Timeline Reveal the Structure of Broadcast Events?. CSCW 2010.
  76.  Shamma, David A., Kennedy, Lyndon, and Churchil, Elizabeth F.. (2009). Tweet the Debates: Understanding Community Annotation of Uncollected Sources. ACM Multimedia.Beijing, China (conference paper)
  77.  Smith, A., and Rainie, L. (2010). 8% of online Americans use Twitter. Subreport of research from Pew Internet & American Life Project (misc)
  78.  Stankovic, Milan. (2009). Faceted Online Presence – A Semantic Web Approach. (mastersthesis)
  79.  Stankovic, Milan. (2009). Faceted Online Presence – A Semantic Web Approach. (mastersthesis)
  80.  Stankovic, Milan, Passant, A, and Laublet, P.. (2009). Directing Status Messages to their Audiences in Online Communities. Pre-proceedings of Coordination, Organization, Institutions and Norms Workshop.Torino, Italy September 7-11. (conference paper)
  81.  Stankovic, Milan, Passant, Alexandre, and Laublet, Philippe. (2009). Status Messages for the Right Audience with an Ontology-Based Approach. The First International Workshop On Collaborative Social Networks – CollaborateSN.Washington, D.C. November 11th. (conference paper)
  82.  Starbird, Kate, Palen, Leysia, Hughes, Amanda, and Vieweg, Sarah. (2010). Chatter on The Red: What Hazards Threat Reveals about the Social Life of Microblogged Information. Proceedings of the ACM 2010 Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work. (CSCW 2010) (conference paper)
  83.  Stieger, S., and Burger, C.. (2009). Let’s go formative: Continuous student ratings with Web 2.0 application Twitter. CyberPsychology & Behavior. (journal article)
  84.  Sullivan SJ, Schneiders AG, Cheang CW, Kitto E, Lee H, Redhead J, Ward S, Ahmed OH, and McCrory PR . (2011). What’s happening? A content analysis of concussion-related traffic on Twitter. British Journal of Sports Medicine, doi:10.1136/bjsm.2010.080341. (journal article)
  85.  Sutton, J., Palen, Leysia, and Shlovski, Irina. (2008). Back-Channels on the Front Lines: Emerging Use of Social Media in the 2007 Southern California Wildfires. Proceedings of the 2008 ISCRAM Conference.Washington, D.C. (journal article)
  86.  Thelwall, M., Buckley, K., and Paltoglou, G.. (2011). Sentiment in Twitter events. . Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 62(2), 406-418. Analysis of changes in sentiment related to major events discussed in Twitter. (journal article)
  87.  Vasileios Lampos, and Nello Cristianini. (2010). Tracking the flu pandemic by monitoring the Social Web. 2nd International Workshop on Cognitive Information Processing.Elba Island, Italy June.
  88.  Vasileios Lampos, Tijl De Bie, and Nello Cristianini. (2010). Flu Detector – Tracking Epidemics on Twitter. ECML PKDD 2010.Barcelona, Spain September. Check Flu Detector\’s website: http://geopatterns.enm.bris.ac.uk/epidemics/
  89.  Wagner, Claudia, and Strohmaier, Markus. (2010). The Wisdom in Tweetonomies: Acquiring Latent Conceptual Structures. Semantic Search Workshop at WWW2010. (conference paper)
  90.  Weisbuch, Max, Ivcevic, Zorana, and Ambady, Nalini. (2009). On being liked on the web and in the ‘real world’: Consistency in first impressions across personal webpages and spontaneous behavior. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 45 (3), 573 – 576. (journal article)
  91.  Wohn, D. Y., and Na, E.-K.. (2011). Tweeting about TV: Sharing television viewing experiences via social media message streams. First Monday, 16 (3). (journal article)
  92.  Wu, Shaomei, Hofman, Jake M., Mason, Winter A., and Watts, Duncan J.. (2011). Who Says What to Whom on Twitter. Proceedings of WWW\’11. Hyderabad, India (conference paper)
  93.  Yardi, Sarita, and boyd, danah. (2010). Tweeting from the Town Square: Measuring Geographic Local Networks. Proceedings of the International Conference on Weblogs and Social Media.Washington, DC (conference paper)
  94.  Yardi, Sarita, and boyd, danah. (2010). Dynamic Debates: An Analysis of Group Polarization over Time on Twitter. Bulletin of Science, Technology and Society, 30 (5). (journal article)
  95.  Yardi, Sarita, Romero, Daniel, Schoenebeck, Grant, and boyd, danah. (2010). Detecting spam in a Twitter network. First Monday, 15(1-4). (journal article)
  96.  Zhao, Dejin, and Rosson, Mary Beth. (2009). How and why people Twitter: the role that micro-blogging plays in informal communication at work. (conference paper)

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s